C48 Mr. K. Andersen on the Species and LXXIII. — A List of the Species and Subspecies of the Genus Jlliinoloplius, with some Notes on their Geographical Distribution. By Knud Andersen. The present paper gives a brief summary of the systematic, phylogenetic, and zoogeograpliical conclusions at winch I have arrived by a study of the bats of the genus Rhinolophus preserved in the British Museum and the United States National Museum. For the details that have served as a basis for the conclusions I must refer to my former papers on this subject*. A Sijstemat'c List of the Species and Subspecies. A. 'The Rhiuolophus simplex Group. 1. Rh. simplex, K. And. — Lombok f. 2. Rh.megaphyllus, i. E. Gray. — Eastern Australia; Louisiade Archi-pelago. 2«. Rh. me(/aphyllus f. typica. — Eastern Australia (Queensland, N.'S, Wales). 2b. Rh. megaphyllus monachus, K. And. — Louisiade Arcliipelago (St. Aignan's Isl.). ? Rh. keyensis, Ptrs. — " Key Islands." 3. Rh. truncatiis, Ptis, — Batchian. 4. R/i. 7unins, K. And. — Goram Island. 5. Rh. celebensls, K. And. — Celebi'S (Makassar, Menado). * Andersen and Matschie, " Ueber einige geographische Formen der Untevgattung Ewyalus,''^ SB. Ges. natiuf. Fr. Berlin, 1904, no. 6, pp. 71-83. Andersen, " Five new Rhinolophi from Africa," Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. (7) xiv., Nov. 1904, pp. 378-388. Id., " On von Heuglin's, Riippell's, and SundevaU's Types of African Rhmo/ojjhi;' t. c, Dec. 1904, pp. 451-458. Id., " Further Descriptions of new Rhinolophi from Africa," op. cit, (7) XV., Jan. 1905, pp. 70-76. Id., " On the Bats of the Rhinolophus pJiilippinensis Group, with Descriptions of Five new Species," op. cit. (7) xvi., Aug. 1905, pp. 243-257. Id., " On the Bats of the Rhinolophus arcuatus Group, with Descrip-tions of Five new Forms," t. c., Sept. 1905, pp. 281-288. Id., " On the Bats of tlie Rhinolophics macrotis Group, with Descrip-tions of Two new Forms," t. c, Sept. 1905, pp. 289-292. Id., " On some Bats of the Genus Rhinolophus, with Remarks on their Mutual Affinities, and Descriptions of Twenty-six new Forms," Proc. Zool. Soc. 1905, ii. (Oct.) pp. 75-145, pis. iii., iv. t When not otherwise stated, the record of the geographical distri-bution of the species and subspecies is based exclusively on examples examined by myself (a few localities quoted from literature are printed between inverted commas).
BioStor
