BioStor
Sign in using Mendeley
MR. n. m'LACHLAN on the ASCALAPIITBiE. 219 "' All Attempt towards a Systematic Classification of the Family AscalaphidcB. By E. M'Lachlak, E.L.S., Sec. Ent. Soc. [Read May 4, 1871.] Fon some years I have been collecting materials with the hope that T might some day publish a monograph of this interesting Ncuropterous family ; but the difficulty of defining the limits of species, owing to their innate tendency to variation, and the ab-sence, in many cases, of one sex, prove to me the impossibility of, at present, writing an exhaustive work. Collectors generally have paid very little attention to these insects ; and without an exami-nation of an extensive series from diiferent localities, a safe generalization on specific forms could not be attempted. I have therefore drawn up the present paper as a sketch of my present knowledge of the family, and as an assistance to myself and others in investigating it. A glance may here be taken at the progress made in the study of these insects. Linne, at the time of publication of the 12th edition of the 'Systcma ISTatura),' knew of only two species, which he placed with Mynneleon. A few years previously, and afterwards, such competent entomologists as Scopoli and the authors of the ' Wiener Verzeichniss,' deceived by external form, described two of the gay-coloured South-European species as Papilios. The genus Ascalapltis, which is synonymous with the family as it now stands, was instituted by Eabricius in his ' Systema Entomologia^.,' in 1776, and at the time of publication of the second volume of the 'Entomologia Systematica,' in 1793, he indicated six species, and one more in his ' Supplement ' in 1798. For a long time the progress was scarcely evident, Bur-meister, in 1839, in his ' Handbuch der Entomologie,' enume-rates only eighteen species as then known to him. In this work is what was probably the first attempt at dividing the old genus Ascalaphus into sections ; and Burmeister in one instance indi-cates a divisional name {Raploglenius), which has since been adopted for a genus. In 1842, Lefebvre, in Guerin's ' Magasin,' made the first essay at a generic splitting-up of Ascalaphus, and divided it into ten genera, under the names Ptynx, Azesia, Amoea, Thele-proctophylla, Proctarrelabris, Ascalaphus, Hyhris, Acheron, Orphne, and Suphalasca. This short paper shows great research and an lilNN. JOUnN. — ZOOLOGT, VOL. XI. 16

Identifiers

Export

An attempt towards a systematic classification of the family Ascalaphidae

R Mclachlan
Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology 11: 219-276 (1873)

Reference added about 1 year ago

Tweet

Viewer

Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Title
áàåäçéèÉöøüæœß
Authors
One author per line, "First name Last name" or "Last name, First name"
Journal
ISSN
OCLC
Series
Volume
Issue
Starting page
Ending page
Date
Year
URL
DOI
 Update 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Page loaded in 5.04192 seconds