S-KJfl-S iVlUS. COM p. ZO^-'L. LIBRARY JUN 2 1 10RR HAKVmimJ UNIVERSITY TRANSACTIONS OF THE SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY Volume 14, No. 11, pp. 137-156 BIOGEOGRAPHY AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS ON ISLANDS IN THE GULF OF CALIFORNIA, MEXICO BY MICHAEL SOULE Stanford University, Stanford, California (Present address: University of Malawi, Limbe, Malawi) AND ALLAN J. SLOAN Assistant Curator of Reptiles and Amphibians San Die°o Natural History Museum SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA Printed for the Society June 10, 1966 J. EL MUERTO 2. ENCANTADA GRANDE 3. MEJIA 4. ANGEL DE LA GUARDA 5. SMITH 6. TIBURON 7. PARTIDA NORTE 8. RAZA 9. SALSIPUEDES 10. SAN LORENZO LORENZO ESTEBAN PEDRO Ma'rTIR PEDRO NOLASCO 5. TORTUGA 16, SAN MARCOS II. SAN -j 12. SAN I 3. SAN 14- SAN Fig. 1. Islands in the Gulf of California referred to in this report. JUN 2 1 1966 C, . ^ Z HARVARD UNIVERSITY BIOGEOGRAPHY AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS ON ISLANDS IN THE GULF OF CALIFORNIA, MEXICO BY MICHAEL SOULE and ALLAN J. SLOAN Introduction The first comprehensive analysis of the herpetofauna of the islands in the Gulf of Cali- fornia was that by Schmidt (1922); in his report of the results of the 1911 "Albatross" expedition, 54 records of island reptiles are given. In 1921 most of the islands were visited by the California Academy of Sciences' "Silvergate" expedition under the leadership of Joseph Slevin. Van Denburgh's (1922) tabulation of 127 records from the Gulf islands includes the material collected by the "Silvergate" personnel. CliflF (1954a) studied the Gulf island herpeto- fauna and published on the snakes (1954b). At that time the total known reptile fauna amounted to some 200 insular populations. Since then about 50 new records have accumulated. Responsible for the acquisition of much of this new material was the Belvedere expedition to the Gulf in the spring of 1962. Lindsay (1962) provided an account of the Belvedere expedi- tion in which he mentioned many of the new records which are formally presented here. Many persons and institutions have made important contributions to this project. Charles E. Shaw, of the Zoological Society of San Diego, and the senior author were responsible for the collection of reptiles obtained on the Belvedere expedition, although all the biologists contributed. Permits to collect reptiles in the Republic of Mexico were granted by the late Luis Macias Arellano, and Rodolfo Hernandez Corzo, Direccion General de Caza, Departamento de Conservacion de la Fauna Silvestre. Field work has been supported by grants from the Belvedere Scientific Fund and the National Science Foundation (G-14426, GB-2317), and donations from Richard M. Adcock, Richard F. Dwyer, and Roy E. Marquardt. Basis for Taxonomtc Decisions. — Many of the Gulf populations are known by two or more names. The majority of these taxonomic uncertainties stem from differences of opinion as to whether a population deserves specific or subspecific recognition. Where decisions as to specific or subspecific rank of insular populations have been necessary, we have in general fol- lowed the suggestion ot Mayr (1942:121): "If we examine the 'good' species of a certain locality we find that the reproductive gap is associated with a certain degree of morphological difference. If we find a new group of individuals at a different locality, we use the scale of diflferences between the species of the familiar area to help us in determining whether the new form is a different species or not. These scales of differences are empirically reached and differ in every family and genus." Comments on Distribution Table. — The distribution of reptiles and amphibians on islands in the Gulf of California is shown in table 1. The table includes 15 new records reported in this paper (see below). The islands are arranged approximately from north (left side of table) to south. Several very small islands close to the mainland on either side of the Gulf, as those in Bahias de los Angeles, Concepcion, and Kino, and near Mazatlan, are not listed. Several very small satellite islands from which only one or two lizards are known are also omitted. References for the table are: Banks and Farmer, 1963; Banta and Leviton, 1963; Cliff, 1954a, 1954b, 1958; Crippen, 1962; Dickerson, 1919; Dixon, 1964; Etheridge, 1961; Figg-Hoblyn and Banta, 1957; Klauber, 1956, 1963; Lowe and Norris, 1955; Savage and Cliff, 1954; Schmidt, 1922; Shaw, 1945; Smith and Taylor, 1945, 1950; Soule, 1961 and in preparation; Van Den- burgh, 1922; Zweifel and Norris, 1955. The location of the islands is shown in figure 1. New Records of Snakes This section contains data on a number of snakes which appear to represent new Gulf island records. Except as noted, the specimens referred to are in the collection of the San Diego Society of Natural History (SDSNH). 140 San Diego Society of Natural History [Vol. 14 J U CS c -^ O •0 ^ o B IS u U G •-t-i -rt O C 3 4) 'C .S CO -13 C < -T3 C .2 15 n 3 -a c cd s II u 1966} SouLE AND Sloan: Herpetofauna of Gulf Islands 141 142 San Diego Society of Natural History [Vol. 14 OA1BJJ33 £9[ isL Z Ku^ipg ^•> 69 — BpiwBd-oauBS niuidsg 55 9^6 9 03SIDUEJJ uBg 9-3 013 Z 3sof UBS t'61 ff9 L U u (/) u w u u u u SBlUIUy SB^ oSaiQ uBg zru3 BauBg bui|bjb;]) BauBg 8JEJJaSUOJ/\J 9'n t'"6I ozz £33 U u ajuBzuBQ 6> 901 SOPEUOJ03 ^8 £83 OSUOppiI UEg 9-3 ^n (jng) sauj BjuES ^- > 6 SOJJBI^ UBS ^"I^ \Ll U u u u u u u u u 3 .2 c o U < BSniJOj^ £-9 ODSB|0|^ ojpaj UBS Zi JUJBi^ ojpad UBS 8' I uB(ja:sg ues ^'^ jns ozusjo'^j UBS ^^^ 60 f 93f 03f U 3»0N OZU3J01 UBS S'8 003 sapandisps 8"1 t'll BZBy I'l [f ajaof^ EpijjBd 1-3 331 "o-inqij. 31 31 81 31 31 U U Qi u u u ijjiuis upjEHQ B[ ap jaSuy Biraj^ apUBjr) BpBJUBDUg oajanj^ |g 3 £9 ^•£ 60 ^9t' 91£I 393 £33 361 a: u u V 2 3 ST s V 3 g X c ra ■c a CO in o ■-CJ 2 bo bo bo ,bo ^^ bo bo bo O o o o o o 5 o o s s C O >o ►o ►J bo "3 w bo .5 -^ ~c S S :^ :^ '^ O O uj "-^ tj Q >- ? != u 2 3 3 T3 "3 T3 ~C ~C -J5 Vj U fj c c c ?s ^ ?s -c ~c -c ■* -c -c >>> — ja o •« 3 '-« -D O _ o a. e _2 i^ o E as 3 u u O X nj J2 u ecies of the California boa, with notes on the genus Lichanura. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 6:305-318. 1931b. Crotalus tigris and Crotaliis enyo, two little known rattlesnakes of the Southwest. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 6:353-370. 1935. Phyllorhynchns, the leaf-nosed snake. Bull. Zool. Soc. San Diego No. 12. 31 pp. 1940a. The worm snakes of the genus Leptotyphlops in the United States and northern Mexico. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 9:87-162. 1940b. Two new subspecies of Phyllorhynchus, the leaf-nosed snake, with notes on the genus. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 9:195-214. 1941. The long-nosed snakes of the genus Rhinocheilus. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 9:289-332. 1956. Rattlesnakes: Their Habits, Life Histories, and Influence on Mankind. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley. 2 vol. xxix + 1476 pp. 1963. A new insular subspecies of the speckled rattlesnake. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 13:73-80. Kramer, G. 1949. Uber Inselmelanismus bei Eidechsen. Z. Ind. Abst. u. Vererb. 83:157-164. Lindsay, G. E. 1962. TTie Belvedere expedition to the Gulf of California. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 13:1-44. Lowe, C. H., Jr., and K. S. Norris 1955. Analysis of the herpetofauna of Baja California, Mexico. III. New and revived reptilian subspecies of Isla de San Esteban, Gulf of California, Sonora, Mexico, with notes on other satellite islands of Isla Tiburon. Herpetologica 11:89-96. MacArthur, R. H. 1957. On the relative abundance of bird species. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 43:293-295. MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson 1963. An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution 17:373-387. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York. 334 pp. 156 San Diego Society of Natural History [Vol. 14 Menard, H. W. 1960. The East Pacific Rise. Science 132:1737-1746. Mertens, R. 1934. Die Insel-Reptilien, ihre Ausbreitung, Variation, und Artbildung. Zoologica 32:1-209. 1952. Schwarzblaue Insel-Eidechsen und die neueren Ansichten iiber ihr Farbkleid. Natur u. Volk- 82:386-395. Murray, K. F. 1955. Herpetological collections from Baja California. Herpetologica 11:33-48. Preston, F. W. 1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Parts I, II. Ecology 43:185-215, 410-432. RODEN, G. I. 1958. Oceanographic and meteorological aspects of the Gulf of California. Pacific Sci. 12:21-45. RoDEN. G. I., AND G. W. Groves 1959. Recent oceanographic investigations in the Gulf of California. Jour. Mar. Res. 18:10-35. Russell, R. J. 1963. Recent recession of tropical cliffy coasts. Science 139:9-15. Savage. J. M., and F. S. Cliff 1954. A new snake, Pbyllorhytichus arenicola, from the Gulf of California, Mexico. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 67:69-76. Schmidt, K. P. 1922. The amphibians and reptiles of Lower California and the neighboring islands. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 46:607-707, pi. 47-62. Shaw, C. E. 1945. The chuckwallas, genus Sauromalus. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 10:269-306. Shepard, F. p. 1950. 1940 E. W. Scripps cruise to the Gulf of California. Part III. Submarine topog- graphy of the Gulf of California. Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 43. 32 pp. Shreve, F.. and I. L. Wiggins 1964. Vegetation and Flora of the Sonoran Desert. Stanford University Press. 2 vol. X + 1740 pp. Smith, H. M., and E. H. Taylor 1945. An annotated checklist and key to the snakes of Mexico. U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 187. 239 pp. 1950. An annotated checklist and key to the reptiles of Mexico exclusive of the snakes. U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 199. 253 pp. SOULE, M. E. 1961. Eridiphas slcvini (Tanner) on Cerralvo Island, Gulf of California, Mexico. Herpetologica 17:61. 1966. Trends in the insular radiation of a lizard. Amer. Nat. 100:47-64. Van Denburgh, John 1922. The reptiles of western North America. Occ. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. no. 10. 2 vol. 1028 pp. Wilson, I. F., and V. S. Rocha 1955. Geology and mineral deposits of the Boleo copper district, Baja California, Mexico. U. S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 273. 134 pp. ZwEiFEL, R. G., and K S. Norris 1955. Contribution to the herpetology of Sonora, Mexico: Descriptions of new sub- species of snakes {Micruroides euryxanthus and Lampropeltis getulus) and mis- cellaneous collecting notes. Amer. Midi. Nat. 54:230-249.