BioStor
Sign in using Mendeley
THE NEOTROPICAL ORB-WEAVER GENERA CHRYSOMETA AND HOMALOMETA (ARANEAE: TETRAGNATHIDAE) HERBERT W. LEVM Abstract. Chrysometa and Homalometa are neo-tropical members of the family Tetragnathidae. Tet-ragnathidae are separated from Araneidae by the configuration of the male palpal parts, the large tar-sal organ on the cymbium and the cone-shaped pal-pal tibia. The female epigynum is flat rather than three-dimensional, often with complicated internal ducts; or rarely, the epigynum is absent. The abdo-men's integument is often underlain by evenly sized white or silver spots. Relative to body size, males have longer chelicerae than females. Tetragnathid males when mating hold females some distance from themselves. In many species the femoral-patellar joint is extended in resting position. There are 127 known species of Chrysometa, 94 of them new; there are three species of Homalometa, two of which are new. Most Chrysometa species oc-cur at high altitudes in the Andes and in paramos (both poorly collected areas); only a few species are known from low elevation rain forests. INTRODUCTION The study of Chrysometa was triggered by numerous inquiries from ecologists and collectors needing help with determina-tions. Unlike many other orb-weaver gen-era, Chrysometa is not readily recognized by ecologists or even by knowledgeable araneologists. While some Chrysometa species are found in low altitude forests and others at intermediate elevations, many are found at and above timberline. The mountains of Central America have proved unexpectedly rich in Chrysometa species, especially at higher elevations. The paramos of the Andes may have three or four species living sympatrically. The high altitude species are puzzling, since no two populations are quite alike. Is each pop-' Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard Uni-versity, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138. ulation a separate species or does each represent a geographic form within a variable species? The placement of the metines, which include Chrysometa and Homalometa, has been controversial. Orb-weaver gen-era related to Meta are found in all parts of the world; the diversity appears great-est in the Indopacific. In American liter-ature they have been placed in the subfamily Metinae of the family Aranei-dae. Brignoli (1983) separated the metids as a distinct family. Other authors, how-ever, have recognized a relationship be-tween the metines and the tetragnathids. Simon (1895, 1929) placed the group in the subfamily Tetragnathinae of his fam-ily Argiopidae. More recently, Locket, Millidge and Merrett (1974) placed Meta of Great Britain in the Tetragnathidae, along with Tetragnatha and Pachygna-tha. In the present treatment I have also placed the metines in the Tetragnathidae, though I still have some doubts about the distinctness of this family. In my past re-visions of nearctic non-cribellate orb-weavers, all the genera were placed in one family (Levi, 1974, 1980a, 1981). Once it was recognized that the orb-web is a primitive character of web spiders (Levi, 1980b; Coddington, 1986), it could no longer be used as a synapomorphy to com-bine the araneids and tetragnathids; con-sequently, the relationship of the two groups required further investigation. The distinctive specialized (autapomorphic) features needed to define the family Tet-ragnathidae are still not satisfactory. However, as revisors remove erroneously included genera from Araneidae, the family becomes easier to define. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool, 151(3): 91-215, November, 1986 91

Identifiers

Export

The Neotropical orb-weaver genera Chrysometa and Homalometa (Araneae: Tetragnathidae)

H W Levi
Bulletin of The Museum of Comparative Zoology 151: 91-215 (1986)

Reference added over 3 years ago

Tweet

Viewer

[0]
[1]
[2]
[3]
Article Start
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Figs. 1-12
Page 102
Figs. 13-22
Plate 1
Map 1
Page 106
Plate 2
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Map 2
Map 3
Map 4
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Figs. 23-46
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Figs. 47-72
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Figs. 73-98
Page 128
Figs. 99-123
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Figs. 124-150
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Figs. 151-179
Page 138
Figs. 180-202
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Figs. 203-233
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Figs. 234-261
Page 148
Figs. 262-287
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Figs. 288-309
Page 154
Figs. 310-333
Page 156
Figs. 334-365
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Figs. 366-393
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Figs. 394-420
Page 166
Figs. 421-434
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Figs. 435-462
Page 172
Figs. 463-490
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Figs. 491-518
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Figs. 519-546
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Figs. 547-575
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Figs. 576-600
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Figs. 601-627
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Figs. 628-657
Page 198
Figs. 658-682
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Figs. 683-710
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Figs. 711-730
Map 5
Figs. 731-747
Page 210
Page 211
Title
áàåäçéèÉöøüæœß
Authors
One author per line, "First name Last name" or "Last name, First name"
Journal
ISSN
OCLC
Series
Volume
Issue
Starting page
Ending page
Date
Year
URL
DOI
 Update 

Localities

Localities extracted from OCR text.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Page loaded in 4.51405 seconds