BioStor
Sign in using Mendeley
IV. — Revision of certain Genera and Species of Starfishes WITH descriptions OF NEW FORMS. By A. E. VkRRILL. Family GONIASTERID^. Goniastericlce Verrill, Trans. Conn. Acad. Sci., i. p. 343, 1867; Perrier, Revision, Arch. Zool. Exper. et Gen., iv. pp. 281, 283, 289, 291, 1875; op. cit., v., p. 1, 1876. Goniastericlce {pars) Forbes, 1840. Pentaceroticlce (jyars) Gray, p. 275, 1866. Pentagonasteridce Perrier, 1884 ; Sladen, p. 260, 1889. The generic nomenclature in this family has become very much confused for several reasons. The genera themselves are difficult to limit and define, and scarcely any two investigators, in the past, have agreed as to their number or limits. Nor have they agreed as to what characters should be con-sidered as of generic value. This was the case, in a very marked degree, and very unfortunately, Avhen the ancient and comprehensive genus Asterias was first divided into numerous genera by J. E. Gray, in 1840, and by Miiller and Troschel, in 1842, In these two works, issued within a brief period, there was very great diversity, both as to the number of genera and their names. In the genus Astrogonium of M. and Tr. four of Gray's genera were reunited into owe. In Goniodisciis M. and Tr., five of his genera were also reunited. For about half a century most subsequent authors have tried to take an intermediate course, but gradually more and more of Gray's genera" have been adopted, though often with their limits more or less modi-fied. Fortunately Gray assigned definite types to his genera, and in his later works he described and figured many of the species, so that in most cases his groups can be readily understood. Moreover he followed, pretty closely, the generally accepted rules of zoological nomenclature, which has not always been done by later writers. The failure of several writers to follow the ordinary and accepted rules of priority has led to much needless confusion of names. The failure to recognize the priority of Gray's generic names "has been the cause of more confusion than any other one thing, throughout the group of starfishes. The efforts that certain writers have made, from time to time, to restrict or apply certain generic names to species or groups to which they were not originally given, has repeatedly led to confusion and Trans. Conn. Acad., Vol. X. August, 1899. 10

Identifiers

Export

Revision of certain genera and species of starfishes with descriptions of new forms

A E Verrill
Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 10: 145-234 (1899)

Reference added over 3 years ago

Tweet

Viewer

Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Title
áàåäçéèÉöøüæœß
Authors
One author per line, "First name Last name" or "Last name, First name"
Journal
ISSN
OCLC
Series
Volume
Issue
Starting page
Ending page
Date
Year
URL
DOI
 Update 
blog comments powered by Disqus
Page loaded in 1.76688 seconds