BioStor
Sign in using Mendeley
INTRODUCTION As a natural outgrowth of a revisionary study of the genus Meso-plodon of the beaked whale family, Hyperoodontidae, 1 toward which I have been working for several years (Moore and Wood, 1957; Moore, 1958, 1960, 1963b, 1966; Moore and Gilmore, 1965) it has recently been possible to devote a little time to seeking out and test-ing diagnostic characters of the other genera of the beaked whale family. That some diagnostic characters are badly needed is indi-cated, for example, by a beaked whale from the Scottish coast re-ported to be Mesoplodon mirus (Stephen, 1931) because its teeth were laterally compressed (Fig. 1, right), but, on checking its nasal bones in October, 1963, at the Royal Scottish Museum, I found it to be Ziphius cavirostris. Similarly, Mousset and Duperier (1956) re-ported at length upon the first Mesoplodon mirus from the coasts of France, but their published photographs of the skull of their speci-men showed it to be Ziphius cavirostris. A Ziphius cavirostris 28 feet long was reported by the late A. C. Stephen (1932, pp. 164-166, fig. 2) who illustrated it by a photograph of its teeth which, like its body length, are those properly of Hyperoodon ampullatus (Fig. 1, center). The urgent need of diagnoses for the hyperoodontid genera of whales is sharply indicated by two papers by McCann recently pub-lished in New Zealand. One of these McCann (1962b) devoted to removing the species Mesoplodon hectori (Gray) 1871, from the genus Mesoplodon and recognizing it as the young of a different genus and species, Berardius arnuxi, which otherwise ". . . is only known from adults!" (Italics and exclamation point McCann's, 1962b, p. 84.) In consecutive pagination with that, McCann (1962c) published an-other paper devoted to removing the species Mesoplodon pacificus Longman, 1926, from the genus Mesoplodon because he had formed the opinion that the one known specimen of pacificus (a skull) must be the female of a different genus and species, Hyperoodon planifrons, 1 After Gray (1866, p. 62) used the name Hyperoodontidae for the beaked whale family in listing the families of whales, he (op. cit., p. 326) noted the priority of its type genus and then rejected it in favor of Ziphiidae for further use in that work and later ones, on grounds not acceptable today by the International Rules for Zoological Nomenclature (inadvertent use of prefix hyper instead of hypo). 209

Identifiers

Export

Relationships among the living genera of beaked whales with classifications, diagnoses and keys

Joseph Curtis Moore
Fieldiana: Zoology 53(4): 209-298 (1968)

Reference added over 3 years ago

Tweet

Viewer

Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Title
áàåäçéèÉöøüæœß
Authors
One author per line, "First name Last name" or "Last name, First name"
Journal
ISSN
OCLC
Series
Volume
Issue
Starting page
Ending page
Date
Year
URL
DOI
 Update 

Specimens

Specimen codes extracted from OCR text.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Page loaded in 3.37737 seconds