Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 54(4) December 1997 249 Carillo de Espinoza, N. & Icochea, J. 1995. Lista taxonomica preliminar de los reptiles vivientes del Perij. Puhlicaciones del Museo del His tor ia Natural del Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Ser. A (Zoologia).49: 1-27. Freire, A. 1991. Dos niievas especies de Bothrops en el Ecuador (Serpientes venenosas). 1 1 pp. Publicaciones de Trabajos Cientificos del Ecuador, Universidad Tecnica de Machala. Freire, A. 1992. Dos nuevas especies de Bothrops en el Ecuador. Revisia de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas. Universidad Central del Ecuador, 4: 73-82. Hoge, A.R. 1966. Preliminary account on Neotropical Crotalinae (Serpentes Viperidae). Memorias do Instituto Butanlan. 32 (1965): 109-184. Hoge, A.R. & Romano, S.A.R.W.L. 1971. Neotropical pit vipers, sea snakes, and coral snakes. Pp. 21 1-293 in Biicherl. W. & Buckley. E.E. (Eds.), Venomous animals and their venoms. Vol. 2. Venomous vertebrates. Academic Press, New York. Hoge, A.R. & Romano Hoge, S.A.R.W.L. 1981. Poisonous snakes of the world. Part 1. Check list of the pit vipers Viperoidea, Viperidae, Crotalinae. Memorias do Instituto Butantan. 42/43 (1978/79): 179-310. Klemmer, K. 1963. Liste der rezenten Giftschlangen. Elapidae. Hydropheidae, Viperidae und Crotalidae. Pp. 255^64 in: Die Giftschlangen der Erde. Behringwerk-Mitteilungen (Sonderband), Marburg. Parker, H.W. 1934. Reptiles and Amphibians from Southern Ecuador. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. (10)14: 264-273. Russell, F.E. 1979. The clinical problem of crotalid snake venom poisoning. Pp. 978-996 in Lee. C.-Y. (Ed.), Snake venoms. Springer- Verlag, Berlin. Schatti, B., Kramer, E. & Touzet, J.-M. 1990. Systematic remarks on a rare crotalid snake from Ecuador. Bothriechis alhocarinata, with some comments on the generic arrangement of arboreal Neotropical pitvipers. Revue Suisse de Zoologie. 97(4): 877-885. U.S. Navy Department, Office of Naval Intelligence. 1968. Poisonous snakes of the world, A manual for use by U.S. amphibious Forces. Ed. 2. 212 pp. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington. D.C. Wiister, W., Golay, P. & Warrell, D.A. 1997. Synopsis of recent developments in venomous snake systematics. Toxicon. 35(3): 319-340. Wiister, W. & IVIcCarthy, C.J. 1996. Venomous snake systematics: implications for snake bite treatment and toxinology. Pp. 13-23 in Bon, C. & Goyffon. M. (Eds.), Envenomings and their treatments. Fondation Marcel Merieux, Lyon. Comment on the proposed conservation of the specific names of Hydrosaurus gouldii Gray, 1838 (currently Varanus gouldii) and Varanus panoptes Storr, 1980 (Reptilia, Squamata) by the designation of a neotype for H. gouldii (Case 3042: see BZN 54: 95-99) D.R. King Departtnent of Terrestrial Vertebrates, Western Australian Museum, Francis Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia I am writing in support of the proposal by Dr R.G. Sprackland, Prof H.M. Smith and Dr P.D. Strimple for the conservation of the specific names of Varanus gouldii (Gray. 1838) and V. panoptes Storr, 1980. I believe that their case was very well put and their suggested solution would be of great benefit in clarifying what is currently an awkward matter. I have written a number of scientific papers and one book on members ( Varanus gouldii, V. panoptes and V. rosenbergi) of what was formerly known as a single species, V. gouldii. In all of these I have followed the nomenclature of Cogger (1992) and feel this is 250 Bulletin ot Zoological Nomenclature 54(4) December 1997 appropriate because of the almost universal acceptance of these specific names in their accustomed senses. I believe that the confusion that has resulted from the publication by Bohme (1991), which was correct under the Code, in the naming of animals within this species complex would be solved by accepting the proposal of Sprackland et al. and that their suggested solution would meet with general approval by herpetologists. I fully support their suggested course of action. Comments on the proposed conservation of the specific name of Varanus teriae Sprackland. 1991 (Reptilia, Squamata) (Case 3043; see BZN 54: 100-103) (1) L.B. Holthuis Nationaal Natuurhistoriscli Museum, Poslhus 95 J 7. 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands I am much surprised to find in the Bulletin a request to conserve a name less than six years old by suppression of a synonym six years older. The application makes admirably clear that there is no doubt that Varanus teriae Sprackland, 1991 and Odatria keitlihornei Wells & Wellington, 1985 are objective synonyms as they both are based on the same holotype specimen. As far as I can see the only reason for suppression of the older name is that its publication was obscure, but through all the publicity it now receives, it is not so any longer. Of course it is to be regretted that the authors of the older name took so little trouble to publicise the results of their research; judging by the application their (1985a) publication is virtually unknown. The facts that the two names were both availably published, that their synonymy is not in any doubt, and that this synonymy has existed for only six years, in my view make it entirely illogical that the older of the two names should be suppressed. In six years a name cannot become so generally accepted that its replacement would be a disaster. The Commission should judge the case on its own merits, and not be influenced that the authors of the older name. Wells & Wellington, have previously been the subject of a nomenclatural controversy. (2) R.G. Sprackland Young Forest Company, 951 Old County Road Suite 134. Belmont. California 94002, U.S.A. H.M. Smith Department oj Environmental. Population and Organismic Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0334. U.S.A. P.D. Strimple Reptile Research and Breeding Facility. 5310 Sultana Drive. Cincinnati. Ohio 45238, USA. Professor Holthuis is opposed (above) to our application to conserve the specific name of Varanus teriae Sprackland, 1991 on the grounds that the name has been in