BioStor
Sign in using Mendeley
Bulletin of Zoological Nonienclature 187 References Dall, W. H. (1898), Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida, etc. : Trans. Wagner Free Inst. Sci. Philad. 3 (4) : 672-675. Hertlein, L. G. (1933). A new gryphaeoid oyster from the Eocene of California ; Trans. San Diego Soc. nat. Hist. 7 (no. 22) : 277-278. Stenzel, H. B. (1947). Nomenclatural synopsis of supraspecific groups of the family Ostreidae (Pelecypoda, Mollusca) : J. Paleont. 21 (no. 2) : 174-175. Gunter, G. (1950). The generic status of living oysters and the scientific name of the conunon American species : Amer. Midi. Nat. ♦S (no. 2) : 438-449. Supplementary Note on the " Gryphaea " problem By G. GUNTER (University of Texas, Institute of Marine Science, Port Aransas, Texas, U.S.A.) (Letter dated 11th October 1951) As an addendum to the enclosed statement which I have signed I should like to point out that Gryphaea has long been used by practically all paleontologists for a fossil genus of oyster which became extinct several million years ago. Gryphaea arcuata was the type species of the genus as set up by Anton (1839). The supposed validation of Gryphaea angulata as the type species of the living genus by Children cannot be valid because it was a nomen nudum of Lamarck, 1801. If Doctor Ranson's argument is that G. arcuata was confused and could not have been properly designated by Anton, it does nothing to validate angidata, an indubitable nomen nudum, and ii arcuata is thro\vn out as the type sjjeeies, it leaves the whole situation in utter and complete confusion. Concerning the matter of usage, it is only in recent years that ostreologists have come to separate the two common living genera of oysters. Taxonomists in this country and Japan who have been concerned with the question have all recognised that Gryphaea is not the proper name and have all stated that Crassostrea is the proper generic or subgeneric designation. SUPPORT FOR M. GILBERT RANSON'S PROPOSAL RE-LATING TO THE GENERIC NAME "GRYPHAEA" LAMARCK, 1819 (CLASS PELECYPODA) By G. LECOINTRE (Pahat, Maroc) (Commission's reference Z.N.(S.)365) (Letter dated 17th October 1951) • Je tiens k vous dire que je suis entierement d'accord avec M. Gilbert Ranson du Mus^vun de Paris sur le point suivant : Le genre Gryphaea Lamarck, 1819, a comme genotype : Ostrea angidata. Je suis tout k fait d'accord 6galement pour que le " Systeme " de Lamarck de 1801 ne soit plus utilise pour la selection du genre.

Identifiers

Export

Support for M. Gilbert Ranson's proposal relating to the generic name Gryphaea Lamarck, 1819 (Class Pelecypoda)

G Lecointre
Bull. Zool. Nom. 6: 187 (1952)

Reference added over 2 years ago

Tweet

Viewer

Page 187
Title
áàåäçéèÉöøüæœß
Authors
One author per line, "First name Last name" or "Last name, First name"
Journal
ISSN
OCLC
Series
Volume
Issue
Starting page
Ending page
Date
Year
URL
DOI
 Update 

Taxon name tag cloud

Taxonomic names extracted from OCR text for document using uBio tools.

Crassostrea Gryphaea Gryphaea angulata Gryphaea arcuata Gryphaea lamarck Mollusca Ostrea Ostreidae Pelecypoda

Taxonomic classification

GBIF classification for taxonomic names in document

blog comments powered by Disqus
Page loaded in 2.64505 seconds